plastic-pollution-and-our-global-oceans

Conversations Across Borders
A podcast born as a collaboration between GlobalNet21 and Traces&Dreams

In this Webinar Interview with Jo Ruxton we discuss the huge problem of plastic waste and its impact on the oceans of our globe.

350 million tonnes of plastic are being produced each year. This could weigh more than humanity, estimated at 316 million tonnes in 2013. 8 million tonnes of plastic enter the ocean every year. If waste management practices don’t improve, scientists predict this amount could increase tenfold by 2025
Plastics make up to around 75% of marine litter, although this can be up to 100% at some sites. Plastic in the ocean breaks up into smaller fragments called microplastics, which have been identified in commercial fish consumed by humans.

Jo Ruxton is the Founder Director and Producer of “A Plastic Ocean” the award winning documentary. It’s been named by Sir David Attenborough as “one of the most important films of our time” and has ignited mass consumer awareness.

Meghnath Dhimal

Dr. Meghnath Dhimal
Environmental Health Scientist
Biography:

Dr. Meghnath Dhimal started his career as an Environmental Health Research Officer in 2005 and has been working as a Chief/Senior Research Officer since 2010 at the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), Government of Nepal. He completed his PhD in Geo-sciences (Environmental Health Sciences) from the Goethe University in 2015, and his Master Degree in Environmental Sciences from Tribhuvan University, Nepal, in 2004. For his PhD studies, he received a German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) scholarship. After the completion of his PhD study, he also worked a Guest Scientist at the Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany from 2016-2018.

Achieving both practical and theoretical advances in environmental and public health research, Meghnath has led research projects on environmental and climate change, non-communicable diseases, neglected tropical diseases and health systems research in Nepal. Recognizing his contribution in the field of climate change and health, he was awarded with the “Young Scientists Award of the Year 2015” by the Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) in 2015. He also received the Nepal Bidhyabhushan “Ka” Award of the Year 2016 by Rt. Hon President of Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal in 2016. He is a Member of the Research Committee, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu (2016-2019); Member of the Global Young Academy (2017-2022); an Expert Member of Public Health and WASH Thematic Group of National Adaption Plan formulation Process, Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal (Since 2016) and Member of Steering Committee on Urban Health Initiative (Since 2018). He has made substantial contributions to developing environmental health and climate change programmes and policies. In Nepal examples include health sector implementation plans and strategies, NAPA, LAPA, PPCR, Climate Change Policy 2011, H-NAP and NAP development in Nepal.

Meghnath has also served the World Health Organization (WHO) in the capacity of Temporary Adviser as well as in the capacity of Climate Change and Health Expert. He has published more than 100 peer-reviewed journal papers, essays, technical reports and articles in the popular press. His research is featured in numerous scientific and media outlets including the Science Daily and Medical Xpress. His research interests include climate change and health, environmental and public health, neglected tropical diseases, non-communicable diseases and gender perspectives on human health.

Find our more here:

https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=iD4CQUgAAAAJ&

How can we improve Global Health and overcome Global Disparities?

A conversation with Dr Meghnath Dhimal.

How to reduce the opportunity gap between developed and developing nations? More specifically, how to address existing disparities in terms of resource allocation, education and economic means? And how to solve major environmental threats to global health, including non-communicable diseases spread by mosquitoes, contaminated water or air pollutants? Dr. Meghnath Dhimal posits that the answers lie in international networking and interdisciplinary collaboration—between scientists and politicians, the environmental and medical communities, Northern and Southern hemispheres, and so forth.

Dr. Dhimal, a Senior Research Officer with the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) and the global health chair at the Global Young Academy (2017-2022), has made substantial contributions to environmental health policies and climate change programs. In addition to his advisory role at the World Health Organization (WHO), he was awarded the Young Scientist of the Year award in 2015 by the Nepal Academy of Science and Technology.

Watch the trailer:
Episode Notes:

In this far-reaching conversation, Dr. Meghnath Dhimal, a Senior Research Officer with the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), reflects on his upbringing in rural Nepal, where disease patterns have significantly shifted since. He talks about being a passionate advocate for combining health and environmental issues in order to better tackle our global burden of disease.

“The major health risk factors at the moment are environmental factors spread by mosquitoes, contaminated water and air pollutants. So until and unless we bring both sectors together, we cannot solve this issue.” – Dr. Meghnath Dhimal

Dr. Dhimal also paints a very clear picture of the opportunity gaps and existing disparities between developed and developing nations. While the former have the bulk of the world’s resources at their disposal to handle but a fraction of global health problems, it’s the other way around for developing nations.

“There is a disparity in terms of resource allocation, in terms of education, everything. We need to change this. And I think we need political reform. It will be a political decision, not a scientific one.” – Dr. Meghnath Dhimal

The scientist calls on his Nepali colleagues abroad to return home and pass on their scientific expertise to future generations, as well as generate data and research about the “developing world,” for a change. He also implores viewers to embrace more holistic solutions to the regional, national and global health challenges we face.

“Most of the problems can only be solved through networking and collaborations. So we need South-South collaboration, South-North collaboration, North-North collaboration and ultimately, we need to maintain peace in the global community.” – Dr. Meghnath Dhimal

Watch the video:
Read the transcript of Dr. Meghnath Dhimal's Video here

Welcome to our series, Researchers with a Passion. My name is Nerina Finetto, and my guest today is…
I am Meghnath Dhimal. I’ve worked in Nepal as an environmental health scientist for the past 15 years. I am also a member of Global Youth Academy, and I’m currently chairing the Global Health Group at Global Youth Academy.

Thank you so much for joining me. What is your research and why did you go for it?
Basically, I was brought up in rural Nepal. I had a curiosity about how modern health is changing for people since my early childhood. Basically, my work is about how these changing environments or environmental factors affect human health. And how we can prevent disease, infections, et cetera, from environmental and social factors. So my research focuses more on the environmental, social and cultural factors, which are linked to the behavior of people. Because if you see the global burden of disease, more than 80% of diseases are attributed to environmental risk factors. And basically, especially in the developing country where I come from, diseases like diarrhea, cholera and respiratory illnesses are common now. And the major risk factors for this are environmental risk factors. Like most developing countries, people still use solid biomass fuel, which is the major cause of respiratory illnesses like pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, et cetera. Now, in urban areas, pollution levels have also increased, which is a major threat for non-communicable diseases, like cardiovascular disease.

To prevent these things, we need to know who are the people at risk. We need to generate the evidence and we need to guide our policymakers. In the present day, all the developing countries are facing a big problem. I’ll say even developed countries, from the climate perspective. And many infectious diseases were the declining trend due to massive interest in the force, but now due to this climate change, the diseases of the lowlands are now sitting towards the hill and mountains. So that is a big threat for a mountainous country like Nepal. And also other neighboring countries like India, China, Bhutan, et cetera. So that means we are facing a new challenge. To address this, this means we have to address the environmental risk factors. Maybe climate change, maybe policy, maybe waste management, it may be water policy, or it may be any noise pollution or any radioactive substance. So part of this, we need the interdisciplinary research. We need to involve the scientists who have a background in social sciences, natural sciences, health sciences, medical science, and we need to use the holistic approach to solve these national problems, regional problems and the global health problems.

What are the challenges that you see for your country and how do you see it related to the global community?
I was brought up in rural Nepal, which is located around 1,500 meters above sea level and I was born in 1981. That means almost 38 years ago. I spent eight years there, but even in these eight years, I saw a lot of changes. And I visited later on and more changes. Like when I was growing up there, I used to drink water that was safe, no diarrhea and at that time there were no mosquitoes. But now people have to use the bed nets, or they’ll suffer from the diseases like dengue, chikungunya or malaria. So in this way, the disease pattern has changed. In that timeline, people are talking about non-communicable diseases. These are the problems of rich people, of the developed world. But now, in each family, there are people with non-communicable diseases – maybe cancer, diabetes, respiratory illnesses or maybe suffering from infectious diseases… Diarrhea, cholera, or maybe suffering from injuries or trauma.

That means we are suffering from people’s vulnerabilities. And if you see the risk factor for this, then it comes in our environment. The water is contaminated, air is polluted, and in the agriculture system, we’re making massive use of pesticides. So there is exposure to pesticides, exposure to pollutants. And then people are getting more and more diseased. That may be both infectious diseases as well as,non-infectious diseases. So this brought something to my mind: why not do work on this? What is the evidence? Most of the evidence comes from Europe and America, but we as scientists from the least developed countries and developing countries, we have to generate our own evidence. And we have to think globally, but we need to act locally.

As per this, we need the local-level evidence. So that encouraged me to work on an issue like climate change and infectious diseases, to act upon it. Luckily, I got an opportunity for my PhD to study in Germany under the DAAD Fellowship, German Academic Exchange Services. I completed my PhD in 2015 from Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. I went back to Nepal and continued my job. Because before coming to Germany, I was in a position like Environmental Health Research Officer and later the Chief of Research Divisions. So that helped me develop networking at the national, regional and global levels. And recognizing my contribution in the field of neglected tropical diseases and climate change, the senior Academy of Nepal, Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, awarded me the Young Scientist Award in 2015, which also encouraged me to work harder in this field.

In 2017, I got a very prestigious Nepal Bidhya Bhusan from the president of Nepal. It is a very prestigious award. And that also encouraged me to work in this field. The same year, the Global Youth Academy approved my application based on my contribution to science and society as a member of the Global Youth Academy. And from 2018, my colleague appointed me as a chairperson of the Global Health Group. So repeatedly, I’m getting the achievements and I’m also contributing to society. And for the past two years, I’ve attended the World Health Summit. Not only am I attending but Nepal is also doing the national summit of health and population scientists because we have to learn from the global community, but we have to apply. We have to bring change in the national scenario. Now, I’m in the high level committee, steering committee, technical committee formed by the government of Nepal. I can give science advice on where the evidence is needed. And we need to use the evidence to formulate our policy, plans and programs, so that we can get maximum benefit from our limited resources. That is my motto.

Beside Nepal, I regularly serve as climate and health expert at the WHO, World Health Organization, and I have already contributed in the Maldives to develop their health national adaptation process (H-NAP) to climate change. And in East Timor, which is a small island country, to develop their H-NAP. And in my own country, where I started a H-NAP for climate change. Because we have to be prepared and these are not limited to the country. These action plans and such assessments need to be done by each country. And it has been passed by the Male Declaration, which was held in Male in Maldives in 2017. These are the regional achievements.

Beside that, based on my paper, the United States’ CDC has also sent their travel notice regarding the zika virus. As a figure in the zika virus. like they have advised pregnant woman not to travel up to 2,000 meters where the zika virus is ongoing. One of the criteria for their decision was my paper, which was published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. So in this way, we can start from the local level and those good practices can go to the regional level and also the international level. In this way, I’m just contributing to global society. As a global citizen and as a scientist from one of the least developed countries, my mission is not to work only in a small country, but to contribute to the global society.

You work as an expert bringing questions about health and environment together. Was this a new approach for your country?
I did my graduate degree in 2004, and then I joined the Nepal Health Research Council, which is the apex body of the government of Nepal, to promote health research in Nepal. Very rarely are there positions in the health sector with a background of the people in Environmental Sciences. And the big challenge for me was that, if I have the issue of let’s say, air pollution, the health sector will say, ‘no, no, no, this is the issue of the environment sector.’ If I talk about the issue of climate change, the person says, ‘no, no, no, this is the issue of the environmental sector.’ We are the people of the health sector. And I used to represent the health sector in the Ministry of Environment. And whenever I talk about health, this is the development process. When you do the impact assessment, we need to see health – the health of the people is very important. Let’s say, if we develop a hydropower dam and it is a threat to health because it became the breeding place of many disease vectors. They’ll say, ‘no, no, no, this is the environmental sector. You don’t need to talk about health. The health sector will do it.’

But if I see this is boarding up my own country, that means environmental health issues are neglected for collective response. And the major risk factors are the environmental factors that are spread by mosquitoes, contaminated water or air pollutants. So until and unless we bring both sectors together, we cannot solve this issue. Like in the 1980s, the big problem in Nepal was respiratory illnesses and diarrhea. Now after 30 years, 40 years, again we’re talking about diarrhea control and respiratory illnesses. This is not only the issue of my country, Nepal. Other developing countries have the same scenario. The reason behind is that people have never utilized an opportunity to bring the two sectors together. I’m happy that many countries have already established the environment health divisions, but still my country hasn’t. We have a recession, right? So we have to bring both sectors together to address other means to protect the health of the people.

The Lancet Commission came up with the 2009 report that climate change was the biggest threat of the 21st century. Later in 2015, they again came out with another commission report that climate change was the biggest opportunity of 21st century because we can take it as an opportunity. Because it’s a threat, and we can address all these environmental factors like air pollution, water pollution, et cetera, and we can protect the health of people. This has given opportunities especially that the least developed countries can access, and can request adaptation from developed countries.

The Green Climate Fund has already received a big amount of money from developed countries and it is a pooled fund. So we can all take an opportunity and not only in a single country of the global community. Even developed countries are equally affected. So our efforts should be for the reduction or mitigation of climate change as well as adaptation to climate change.

How did Nepal change?
Recently, we published a report on the national burden of disease in Nepal. We have a clear sense of the trend of disease in Nepal. It shows that over the years, we have been very successful in reducing child mortality rates, infant mortality rates, and we have achieved almost all Millennium Development Goals. So Nepal was one of the countries to achieve most of the goals. Now it is SDG3, which talk about health and well-being. And if you see the changing pattern of disease, we have achieved great, we made a great achievement on infectious diseases. The third now is that diseases are now seen in the new area, where they were not endemic in the past. So that is a big challenge. The overall caseload is reduced, but even a single case is a threat. So it is getting silenced and second, now more than 68% premature causes of death are due to non-communicable diseases. That means diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, et cetera.

So now, our big challenge is how to combat these NCD epidemics. Though we have already made multi-sectorial NCD action plans, we need to implement them effectively. And we had quite a tough time in the past because we’re in the transition from a monarchy/ unitary system to the federal system. So now we have a different three-tier government. We need to make new multi-sectorial city action plans, and we need to take the evidence we have generated by the scientists, and we need to make evidence-based then we can combat means, we can prevent and control non-communicable diseases in the future.

For this, we need investment in the adolescents. Because if we can do investment right now, then we can control the incidences in the future. Because these are chronic diseases. So, in a nutshell, that means the big challenge for us now is the control of non-communicable diseases. Because that covers the major portion of the burden of disease in Nepal. And equally important is how to sustain the achievements we have made in the past. We have a plan for the elimination of malaria by 2026. So we need to work harder. We need to sustain those achievements, right? And we have eliminated some goals for eliminating the viruses and other diseases. But the pattern is now changing in the new area, which we’ve not intervened in the past. So we need to scale up our programs. We need to strengthen our service programs, then we can achieve our work.

What would you like to change tomorrow?
The first thing is that yes, it’s actually systems. We have to state our goal of systems, we have to increase our transparency. And Nepal is such a kind country, I’ll say. It has made such a kind constitution that it has a basic health, basic education, like the right to live in a healthy environment – it’s a fundamental right of citizens. So the document is already very fine. Now we have to implement it. And we’re making hundreds of new laws. Like, we recently came up with the Public Health Act. And it has also been amended. If somebody gets ill because of the environmental factors or this factor, he can complain. He can file a case, and he can get compensation.

So, it is now time to change the country. Our prime minister has the vision: a prosperous and happy Nepal. So, for all of this, actually, we do all have a duty but a single person cannot make change. We need to collectively join forces. For that, we are working, and we have good economic growth right now. And we aim to bring change in the country, in at least the next decade. For that, the scientists who are abroad, who went abroad to study, they need to come back to the home country and they need to solve the country’s problems. Only then can education bring change to the life. Not when the life of the people in the society and in the nation as a whole. So I actually request to all my Nepali colleagues and Nepali scientists to come back and work for the country. We need to bring change in the country. And if there is change in the country, if we get graduates from developed to developing countries, then we can also see our quality of life and image in the international arena [improve].

What does the world need the most right now?
Most of the problems can only be solved through networking and collaborations. So we need South-South collaboration, South-North collaboration, North-North collaboration and ultimately, we need to maintain the peace in the global community. The next thing is international trade and controlling crime and disputes. So the first thing we need is to bring peace in society, to bring peace in the community. That is a big challenge to achieve, but we have to work on it, and only then can humankind sustain itself on this earth.

Do you have a dream?
My dream is to serve the global community. Living in my own country or living abroad, but to serve the global community. My land, my mother and the global community have given many things to me. So I need to give back. I can only pay back that debt by giving the service to them, giving the experience to them. So my dream is to bring the health improvement in the people of the global community.

What kind of society do you dream of?

Yeah, a prosperous society, with less disparity among society’s members, because the big challenge of the global community now is the big disparity: economic disparity, in terms of gender, of economic status. So we need to narrow down this gap. Because every citizen on this Earth has the same rights. Let’s say I talk of literacy increases; they are in a 90 by 10 gap. Developed countries have, let’s say, 10% of the world’s health problems, but 90% of the resources are invested there. And developing countries have 90% of the world’s health problems, but less than 10% of the resources. So there is a disparity in terms of resource allocation, in terms of education, everything. So we need to change this. We need to bring change to this gap. For this, I think we need political reform. It will be a political decision, not a scientific decision.

So every politician should have the enlightenment to bring change to the global community, bridging the gap and bringing down disparity. It is a political issue. It’s an economic issue. I think we need to have a holistic approach, which means scientists can give their evidence, but politicians can make decisions and we can bring change in our lifetime.

What is life about?
For me, life is to be balanced – in terms of an academic career, of family life and of societal life. So if I’m very much an expert only in academic life, that’s not life, because I forget to live the family life. I need to balance my family life. And I also need to give time to my society, or the society will not recognize me. For me, balance is a critical role. Like the balanced diet, I have to make my life balanced between scientific committees, society and also my family. So that is my motto, and I am doing that.

I got an opportunity to do my PhD in Germany. I came here and I had a small daughter, and in my society especially, for females, it is about duties like childbirth and rearing. But I did not limit it to that, with small kids and having other new kids. Even my wife did her PhD and I contributed a lot. We went back to Nepal together, both with PhDs, and we are working together. One person takes care of the babies and the other goes to the conference. In this way, I’m managing and at the same time, I am giving time to my family like my mother, my society, my office. I can also stay in Europe longer, but what I thought was that I had to stop by my home country. So we went back.

Thank you so much for this conversation!
Thank you.

And thank you all for watching, listening and sharing. Keep wandering and see you soon again. Bye and ciao.

Biography:

Dr. Meghnath Dhimal started his career as an Environmental Health Research Officer in 2005 and has been working as a Chief/Senior Research Officer since 2010 at the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), Government of Nepal. He completed his PhD in Geo-sciences (Environmental Health Sciences) from the Goethe University in 2015, and his Master Degree in Environmental Sciences from Tribhuvan University, Nepal, in 2004. For his PhD studies, he received a German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) scholarship. After the completion of his PhD study, he also worked a Guest Scientist at the Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany from 2016-2018.

Achieving both practical and theoretical advances in environmental and public health research, Meghnath has led research projects on environmental and climate change, non-communicable diseases, neglected tropical diseases and health systems research in Nepal. Recognizing his contribution in the field of climate change and health, he was awarded with the “Young Scientists Award of the Year 2015” by the Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) in 2015. He also received the Nepal Bidhyabhushan “Ka” Award of the Year 2016 by Rt. Hon President of Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal in 2016. He is a Member of the Research Committee, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu (2016-2019); Member of the Global Young Academy (2017-2022); an Expert Member of Public Health and WASH Thematic Group of National Adaption Plan formulation Process, Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal (Since 2016) and Member of Steering Committee on Urban Health Initiative (Since 2018). He has made substantial contributions to developing environmental health and climate change programmes and policies. In Nepal examples include health sector implementation plans and strategies, NAPA, LAPA, PPCR, Climate Change Policy 2011, H-NAP and NAP development in Nepal.

Meghnath has also served the World Health Organization (WHO) in the capacity of Temporary Adviser as well as in the capacity of Climate Change and Health Expert. He has published more than 100 peer-reviewed journal papers, essays, technical reports and articles in the popular press. His research is featured in numerous scientific and media outlets including the Science Daily and Medical Xpress. His research interests include climate change and health, environmental and public health, neglected tropical diseases, non-communicable diseases and gender perspectives on human health.

Find our more here:

https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=iD4CQUgAAAAJ&

Channel “Idioms of Normality”

Idioms of Normality
A channel hosted by Dr. Paul Mason
Dr. Paul Mason is an Australian anthropologist who works on human and planetary health. In this space, we share the conversations Paul has about normality with people from all walks of life from Australia and around the world.

What is normal? How does normality impact our lives? What would the world look like if we took seriously the idea that normality is not real? Accompany Paul on his exploratory tour to better understand the way in which people think about normality and the way it shapes our lives and impacts upon the planet.

Want to know more? We invite you to join the conversation! Write to us with questions about normality, or if you would like Paul to further explore some aspects you are particularly interested in.

Coming on September 1st. Stay tuned.

In this episode, Paul talks with Dr. Jonathan Marshall from the University of Technology, Sydney. They discuss ethics, ambiguity, complexity, politics, climate change, resilience and capitalism as well as the reality of fraught solutions. If normality does not exist, why then are we still seduced to think in terms of normality and lead our lives as though it does? Join us as we venture into provocative territory to rethink current approaches to global problems in this episode of Idioms of Normality.

The Fantasy and Reality of Normality.

How is ambiguity constructed for political gain? How are myths deployed to sustain power? In this episode of ‘Idioms of Normality,’ Professor Anton Piyarathne shares his personal experiences growing up in Sri Lanka and talks about the myth of ‘Grease Yakā in Sri Lankan political culture.’ Anton discusses how the Sri Lankan public uses humor and satire to navigate and critique political uncertainty and government credibility. This conversation sheds light on the powerful role of cultural expressions in political discourse and the unique ways communities adapt to political challenges. With a rich discussion of how myths are constructed and how they influence people’s lives, Anton offers some useful insights into how people can approach the fantasies and realities of other myths, such as normality.

Find the book here: https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526173843/

Failing normality

When things go wrong, do we fail normality, or has normality failed us? In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Dr. Timothy Heffernan, an anthropologist at the University of New South Wales, who recently coedited the volume The Anthropology of Ambiguity published by Manchester University Press. As part of a special sub-series featuring contributors to this volume, Paul and Tim explore the complex relationship between normality and ambiguity, particularly during times of crisis.

Drawing from his fieldwork in Iceland, Tim discusses how ambiguity is deliberately constructed in political and social contexts to navigate economic collapse, deflect blame, and ultimately shape social recovery. The conversation also explores how the crisis-recovery nexus can be “queered,” challenging traditional notions of personhood and social transformation in the aftermath of collapse. Join us for a thought-provoking discussion on how ambiguity reshapes normality and what this means for the future of social norms.

Find the book here: https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526173843/

 

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul Mason speaks with Dr Sarah Chaney from the Centre for the History of Emotions about her book, Am I Normal? published by Profile Press and the Wellcome Trust. Sarah’s work spans the nearly 200 year history of the conception of normality as a statistical concept in the early 19th century through to its psychological impact on modern populations. Sarah shares with us stories about normality’s key proponents and their eugenic pusuits. Through the story of two 1940s statues called Normman and Norma, Sarah shows that even when evidence was provided to show that normal didn’t exist, people still persisted with the false understanding that normal was object, rational and real. Sarah encourages us to question normality, to consider what people really mean when they use the word normal, and to be critical about the work done by this word when deployed by various specialists.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul meets with Professor Andrea Wiley, a biological anthropologist at Indiana University who looks at how stats and figures about what constitutes normal can have a rebound effect on our biology. Descriptions of human populations can very quickly become conflated with prescriptions for human populations and Andrea specialises at looking at the various dimensions of these complex dynamics. Milk, she points out, is readily accepted as coming from a nonhuman species, but how did this become the standard? Andrea points out how our language, science and production of normality can create social disparities that we should be concerned about.

Jessica Leski is the first documentary maker to be interviewed by Dr Paul Mason on Idioms of Normality. Her documentary, “I Used To Be Normal: A Boyband Fangirl Story”, follows the lives of four boyband fangirls to learn more about this phenomenon. Reflecting on her experiences making this documentary, Jessica points out how acceptable it has become to don a football jumper and support your favourite team at a stadium on the weekend, but how being madly crazy about your favourite boy band is still on the margins of what might be considered normal behaviour by wider society. Fervent adoration of celebrities, however, can be traced back to the ancient Romans if not earlier. And yet, normality is called into question when it comes to an obsessive infatuation with a member of a boy band. What is normal? And can normal even be defined? In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Jessica and Paul discuss the range of variability in human ritualistic, artistic, and fantastic behaviour.

Learn more about Jessica Leski’s documentary, “I Used to Be Normal”, here:

www.boybandfangirl.com
https://www.madman.com.au/i-used-to-be-normal-a-boyband-fangirl-story/

On the dark side of normality

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul is joined by Bruce Smyth, Professor of Family Studies at the Australian National University. Their discussion spans family dynamics, post-separation parenting, and creative disruption. When people can become stuck in unhelpful patterns, Bruce advocates for finding creative ways to bring people out of their spiraling orbits. Bruce brings a sense of curiosity, a holistic and heterodox mindset, and a humble approach to studying anger, conflict, and hatred. “What is good for the parents,” Bruce says, “Is also good for the children.”

Dr Diego Silva in conversation with Dr Paul Mason.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with bioethicist Dr Diego Silva who conducts research in public health ethics and teaches the Masters of Public Health and the Masters of Bioethics at the University of Sydney. Paul and Diego discuss the distinction between normal as a descriptive and prescriptive term and the value in disentangling these two concepts. They also discuss the value, and importance, of including as many diverse voices as possible in these discussions. With a specialty in studying pandemics, Diego brings some interesting thoughts to bear upon the last few years of lockdowns and public health efforts.

Dr Paul Mason in conversation with Dr Catie Gressier and Tammi Jonas.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul is joined by two brilliant thinkers in Australian agroecology, Dr Catie Gressier and Tammi Jonas. If you have ever questioned the industrial practices that put food on your plate then this conversation is for you! And, if you haven’t questioned these practices, then this discussion will jolt you into action. Tammi, the author of Farming Democracy and president of the Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance, brings firsthand expertise to the discussion of what is normal in food production. Catie, whose work has spanned Australia and southern Africa, brings anthropological perspectives to bear upon questions of diet, cuisine and resource management. This thrilling discussion covers territory that will drop the jaw of many viewers and have others shouting “Praise!”

Dr. Chris Houston and Dr Paul Mason in conversation

The word “normal” has only migrated recently into Turkish. So is asking “what is normal?” the best question to ask a specialist on Turkey? In this episode, Paul meets with Associate Professor Chris Houston, an anthropologist from Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Chris has been conducting fieldwork in Turkey since 1994. He draws upon his fieldwork experiences to unpack the concept of normality. “What is normal?”, Chris points out, “does seem to be a particularly obsessive question of certain societies.” are obsessed with asking what is normal. In other societies, the concept does not even appear. Is normality universal? Chris shares insights from his work with marginal communities, his work in Istanbul, and his forthcoming edited volume on self-alteration.

Professor Susanna Trnka

How do different peoples define their sense of normality? In the discipline of socio-cultural anthropology, researchers are often preoccupied with a cross-cultural and historical understanding of what normal looks like among diverse communities. Professor Susanna Trnka from the University of Auckland draws upon her fieldwork in Fiji, in the Czech Republic, and in New Zealand to unpack how normality is constructed and contested. She shares some wonderfully insightful fieldwork stories to help us to view normality from different angles. She discusses examples from her research articles and books to explain the conventions of normality in diverse cultural settings. The cross-cultural examples offer some multifaceted understandings of normality as humans can come to live it in different life circumstances and conditions.

Daniel Maté

“How is normality working for you?” asks author, composer, lyricist, and playwright, Daniel Maté, who joins Paul in this episode of Idioms of Normality. Daniel discusses his new book, The Myth of Normal, coauthored with his father, world famous psychiatrist, Gabor Maté. “Normality”, Daniel says, “makes idiots of us all.” This hard-hitting discussion rips into the topic of normality and explores how easily humans can become accustomed to self-harming social conditions. Normal, argues Daniel, is one of the biggest causes of worldwide trauma. Alienating people from their authentic selves, the concept of normality has both psychological and social harms. Listeners might be left asking if Daniel and Gabor’s book should perhaps be on the politics shelf in libraries and bookstores given the political dimensions of taking this argument seriously.

 

 

Interview with the film director Mragendra Singh

An optimistic take on normality.

Writer and director Mragendra Singh joins Paul in this episode of Idioms of Normality to discuss his new film, Normal. The film is about a couple who have a child and lose intimacy in their marriage. They are looking to get back to normal. With an optimistic take on normality, Mragendra reflects upon what normal is to him and what normal could look like more widely. Asking people, “What is normal?”, Mragendra has found can often be an insightful foray into the lives of others. Mragendra’s film, Normal, is available on Apple TV.

Normality – An Afro-Puerto Rican Perspective

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Dr David Colón-Cabrera, a medical anthropologist based at Monash University. The discussion covers gender, race and body modification. David brings his own experiences as a non-binary Afro-Puerto Rican as well as his research experiences studying male circumcision to an insightful discussion that demonstrates how reframing default positions can expand the horizons of old debates.

Professor James Trauer is an infectious disease physician and epidemiologist who works at Monash University. His work in disease modeling has kept him extremely busy these past couple of years so we are fortunate to steal a little bit of his time. Little has been “business as usual” for medical doctors these past couple of years and Professor Trauer shares his insights into how healthcare delivery has adapted and changed as the “normal” has been irrevocably called into question.

Today’s guest is Emma Jane, author of “Diagnosis Normal: Living with abuse, undiagnosed autism, and COVID-grade crazy”.

Emma and Paul explore the exactness and limitations of the simile that normality is like fire. The concept of normality has a power like fire and can have very real and tangible effects on people’s lives. For Emma, her interest in normality is both personal and academic. Her subjective experiences have helped her to develop a critical distance from the concept of normality and allow her to question the moments where it is useful and the moments where it is not. Emma offers perspectives that are witty, challenging, and insightful.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul interviews dancer and performing artist Josh Horner whose career spans ballet, musical theatre, and TV. Josh challenges the question “what is normal?” and discusses the importance of play, discipline, goal-setting, confidence, engagement, relationships and living life large and out of the box. With infectious energy, Josh shares insightful self-reflections about how to challenge the notion of a ‘normal’ career.

What does normality look like from the position of someone living with chronic illness? In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Kimberly McReynolds a herpetologist who worked as a nurse in a previous career. Kimberly reflects upon normality in academia, our perspectives on normality in the animal kingdom, and the experience of normality from someone whose embodied experiences lie outside the range typically considered normal.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Dr. John Richters humbly reflects on his career and his personal life to distill some hard-won wisdom about the application and limits of the concept of normality. The centrality of normality in much psychological research compromises the veracity of the research findings. So what alternatives does Dr Richters suggest? When the research paradigm shifts, the questions we ask change. To find out more, listen to this episode about the assumptions of normality.

What if we stop trying to fix people and start empowering them for who and what they are?
How to Live, Learn, and Thrive, Outside the Line

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul interviews Jonathan Mooney, author of Normal Sucks. Jonathan shares his personal experiences of growing up on “the wrong side of normal” and the hardwon insights he has learnt from finding value in his difference. He pays his insights forward and teaches others how to recognise, resist and reframe normality in their own lives. Normal can be written into the fabric of the systems we work within as students, citizens and employees. Recognizing and reframing normality, wherever it rears its ugly head, is important if we wish to achieve social and environmental justice.

Does the “normal” body exist?

Challenging images of normality.

This is podcast episode 38 of Idioms of Normality. A series hosted by Dr. Paul Mason for #futureframedTV, the collective podcast of Traces&Dreams.

Is there a normal? Amanda Thorson reflects upon her own professional experiences as a photographer and her personal experiences of becoming a mother in this episode of Idioms of Normality hosted by Dr Paul Mason. Amanda discusses the cultural imperatives that burden the female body. In her photographic work, she strives to embrace the diversity of the human form. Her latest work is a book called, “There is no normal”, which attempts to popularise experiences of womanhood that are often excluded from mainstream media. Challenging images of normality in this way isn’t simply visual pursuit, but rather an endeavour to reframe how women experience, understand, and enjoy their bodies.

Indigenous know better

Will indigenous wisdom revolutionise our understanding? This is podcast episode 37 of Idioms of Normality. A series hosted by Dr. Paul Mason for #futureframedTV, the collective podcast of Traces&Dreams.

Is it normal to talk to plants? In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul talks with Dr Sophie Chao whose fieldwork experiences among the Marind of West Papua prompted deep reflection on who and what is normal.

The Marind people are being displaced by deforestation and the spread of palm oil plantations, which highlights the urgency of understanding their lifeworlds. A pivotal moment during Sohpie’s time conducting fieldwork with the Marind came when she realised that people were not always gossiping about people but were casually discussing the actions and attributes of nonhumans including plants and animals.

Sophie discovered that the Marind discuss other organisms in the forest the same way that we might talk about siblings, friends and acquaintances. In true ethnographic style, Sophie’s fieldwork prompts us to reflect if we in the West are the abnormal ones looking to destroy forests and replace them with monocrops and if perhaps if the world would be a better place if ways of being in the world such as those of the Marind were, in fact, the normal.

WHAT IS POST-NORMAL SCIENCE | Does science need to slow and how much philosophy does science need?

Does science need to slow down? How much philosophy does science need? What is knowledge and what are the relevant questions to be asked about it?

This is podcast episode 36 of Idioms of Normality. A series hosted by Dr. Paul Mason for #futureframedTV, the collective podcast of Traces&Dreams.

In this episode, Paul talks with Dr Fanny Verrax a French philosopher who has worked on a variety of environmental issues and has contributed to the field of postnormal science. She describes the basic tenets of postnormal science and shares her story about why it might be important to keep normal as a statistical object but to excise it from being a cultural imperative.

Traces.Dreams is a place on the web for people interested in the past, passionate about the present and curious about the future. Traces.Dreams is where you can find inspiration through a multidisciplinary and multi-regional perspective. Our vision is to make the big questions and dreams of today’s researchers visible. We interview researchers from different disciplines and countries to get their perspective on their work, their views on life, their “whys”, their motivation and their wishes.

WE ARE DEALING WITH AN INVISIBLE ENEMY | Is normality a good way to think about evolutionary biology
Is normality a good way to think about evolutionary biology? This is podcast episode 35 of Idioms of Normality. A series hosted by Dr. Paul Mason for #futureframedTV.

In this episode, Paul speaks with Professor Ryszard Maleszka from the Australian National University.

Ryszard Maleszka received his MSc and a PhD from the Department of Genetics, University of Warsaw and has done postdoctoral work at the National Research Council of Canada before moving to Australia in 1987. Since 1998 he has been spearheading a research theme called ‘From Molecules to Memory’ that uses invertebrate model systems to study the genotype to phenotype link, and to understand how epigenetic modifications contribute to environmentally-driven phenotypic plasticity and the maintenance of memory. He is a member of several genomic consortia and advisor to genomic databases. He has published over 100 papers including research and popular articles, reviews and book chapters.

A MASSIVE GLOBAL PROBLEM | Who does have the luxury to challenge normality? Dr. Almas Taj Awan
Who is allowed to challenge normality? In this podcast episode, Paul speaks with Dr. Almas Taj Awan. She is a Scientist and Entrepreneur born in Pakistan and based in Brazil. She is the host of the series #innovationfromtheglobalsouth.

Enjoy the episode!

Decoupling Normality
In this episode, Paul speaks with Dr Humberto Bettini who teaches economics in the Department of Engineering and Production at the University of São Paulo. Humberto lucidly describes how the concept of normal has become confused and unhelpful. Bringing his personal and professional experiences to bear upon the question, Humberto advocates for the concept of normality to be decoupled from sibling concepts such as normativity, conformity, and superiority.

The range of normality.
In this podcast episode, Paul speaks with the medical doctor and martial artist Dr. Chris Lemoh, a physician with mixed cultural heritage currently working at Medicine Monash Health in Australia. Early in his career, a friend’s father who was a psychiatrist told him, “Don’t ever accept the statistical definition of normal.

Try to escape the tyranny of the bell curve.” Chris reflects thoughtfully upon his work with people from diverse ethnic backgrounds including refugee patients. Medical definitions of the normal, he finds, can be both helpful and a hindrance.

Author of “The Perfect Vagina: Cosmetic Surgery in the Twenty-First Century”, Dr. Lindy MacDougall joins Paul in this podcast episode of Idioms of Normality. Why do we tell people what to do with their bodies? What is it that makes our bodies so susceptible to social influence? How does the experience and presentation of the body define patterns of social inclusion?

Lindy and Paul discuss how personal insecurities, the desire to be normal or perfect, and consumerism work together to drive an industry that tells women what their bodies should look like. The pursuit of beauty can sometimes work to the detriment of our health and Lindy’s research offers some provocative case examples to think about.

Breaking Normal with Dr. Lucas Marie. Not many academics break free of the ivory tower to dance hip hop. This week’s guest on Idioms of Normality is Dr. Lucas Marie who not only loves to windmill, headspin, and six-step, he gets to call it research when he does.

His love of anthropology and performance led him to a study of breaking in Western Australia. He studies globalisation and localisation and brings his hardwon insights to the question, “What is normal?”

Lucas and Paul grapple with whether or not normality is a useful concept and discuss the usefulness of an anthropologist’s own sense of abnormality as a fruitful tool of social inquiry.

Does normality breed indifference for lives different than our own? Today we talk about Refugees in Australia.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Marjorie Tenchavez, founder of Welcome Merchant, a social enterprise that elevates refugee-powered businesses in Australia. Beneath a beautiful veneer of beaches and biodiversity hides an ugly underbelly of bureaucratically protected borders that can make the refugee experience in coming to Australia horribly difficult. Does normality breed indifference for lives different than our own? Marjorie discusses her personal journey into this work as well as the stories and fulfillment she has felt along the way.

What does feminism teach us about life? Who decides what is normal for a boy and what is normal for a girl? Notions of normality podcast.

In this podcast episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Dr Adele Pavlidis from Griffith University in Australia. Her work has a central focus on women in sport but spans many different areas of sociology and feminism. Paul and Adele talk about the gender, politics, and economics of care among other topics and discuss the importance of questioning values that we naturalise in popular society.

Challenging Normality with Yensi Alejandra Flores Bueso.
In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Yensi Flores Bueso, a synthetic biologist studying cancer at the University College Cork, Ireland.

Yensi discusses normality in the laboratory and its cultural life outside the laboratory. Normal is a term used often in experimental science but has several shortcomings. In wider society, these shortcomings have become amplified and normality is a concept that deserves to be challenged in order to lead an authentic life.

Can we go back to everyday normality, and what is normal nowadays? This is episode 26 of Idioms of Normality. A series hosted by Dr. Paul Mason for #futureframedTV

In this episode, Paul Mason interviews Robert Lepenies from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. Is he a philosopher? Is he an economist? Is he a political scientist? Robert describes himself as an undisciplined academic. His answer to the question “what is normal?” is unique and insightful! He says we need to think about three things to answer this question: (1) luxury, (2) hope, and (3) power. The reasons behind this answer could very well help you to question normality and disrupt social and environmental imbalances. Tune in!

Can you feel the massive disruption of normality? What is normal nowadays? Learn more about a major cultural shift of norms with Associate Professor Lisa Wynn.

In this podcast episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Associate Professor Lisa Wynn, an anthropologist at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. They discuss Lisa’s work on sexuality in the middle east and the conflation of norms and ideals in popular culture. They also discuss the establishment of new social norms in the context of COVID19 and how we collectively rally behind new norms that are ostensibly scientific, objective, and factual, but nonetheless cultural and symbolic.

Mental health, psychiatry and the history of normality

In this episode, Dr. Paul Mason speaks with Professor Roy Richard Grinker, author of Nobody’s Normal. They discuss mental health, psychiatry and the history of normality. Is normality something real and natural or is it something humans made up? And, if it is made up, how did we construct this concept and what are the consequences of deploying it? In this compelling episode, Professor Grinker discusses his study of autism, the mental health industry, and the social consequences of our classificatory labels.

The Illusion of Normality

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul interviews stage magician and environmental scientist Pierre-Ulric Achour. In this wide-reaching conversation, they explore normality’s domain. Normality has applicability when examining inanimate objects using scientific methods. But, does normality have application when considering biological organisms such as humans in all their messy complexity? And, has the stability of the Holocene tricked humans into an illusory understanding of normality?

The Hegemony of normalcy

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Professor Lennard Davis, author of Enforcing Normalcy and The End of Normal, joins Paul in a discussion about the history, cultural dynamics, and hegemony of normalcy. This must-watch episode unpacks the widespread influence normalcy has had on the contemporary world. With a view towards social justice, Lennard leads us to ask if there is a utopia where we are not under the sway of the normal and, if so, what does that look like?

Normality and Education

In this episode, Paul interviews Drs Joanna and Kate Winchester, sisters who both conduct research into education in Australia. Challenging established doctrine and traditional educational practice, their research looks at new ways of cultivating pedagogical experiences.

The Pursuit of Normality

In this episode, Paul interviews Professor Elizabeth Shove, a sociologist at Lancaster University who co-directs the Centre on Dynamics of Energy, Mobility and Demand. Enormous resources are consumed in the pursuit of normality and Elizabeth shares her insights into challenging the everyday practices that we have come to take for granted.
The Demand Dictionary of Phrase and Fable that she mentions in the interview is available online: http://www.demand.ac.uk/demand-dictionary/

The Speed of Normality

In this episode, Paul speaks with Ashwin Segkar. Ashwin describes normality as a dull, grey field with red flags all around that mark the boundaries of where you should and should not be in life. He describes his career as abnormal but time-rich. After discussing the lure of normality, Ashwin finishes by asking “Who profits from normality?” — an intriguing and thought-provoking question to ask.

The social conditioning of normality

Professor Emeritus Allan Horwitz, author of “What’s Normal? Reconciling Biology and Culture”, joins Paul in this episode of Idioms of Normality. Allan discusses a sociological and biological approach to understanding normality. His wealth of experience researching mental health is brought into the discussion to enlighten how cultural and biological imperatives can sometimes operate in conflict with each other.

Normality, Diseases, and Uncertainty.

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul meets with Associate Professor Greg Fox who works on infectious lung disease in Vietnam and Australia. Greg talks about how the normal is defined in clinical and epidemiological terms as well as its use and application for patients. While serving a diagnostic function, when the normal is brought out of the diagnostic toolkit, does it simply become a tool of reassurance?

Challenging Common Sense

In this episode, Paul meets with philosopher Tim Dean. Tim answers the coming of age question, “what is normal?”, and discusses how two types of social norms, descriptive and prescriptive norms, can often bleed into each other. In a broad sweeping conversation, Paul and Tim discuss the social consequences that can follow from this confusion.

Changing the world with edible bugs

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with entomologist and food scientist, Skye Blackburn. We talk about bugs in your food. What started off as a fun hobby for Skye has turned into a world-changing enterprise to hook people on edible bugs.

Beyond Normality

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Dr Bob Rich, author of From Depression to Contentment. Bob discusses the challenges faced by people in contemporary society, as well as some of the tools in his latest book that offers therapeutic pathways to heal scars as well as spiritual tools to strive for contentment and hopefully even enlightenment.

https://bobrich18.wordpress.com/2020/10/04/chapter-1-from-depression-to-contentment-a-self-therapy-guide/

The Hauntings of Normality

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with Associate Professor Tess Lea, author of Wild Policy. They discuss the legacy that can be left by policy and legislation for future generations and the ghosts of the past that can haunt and predate future generations based on the standards of normality promoted by past generations.

The parameters of normality

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul speaks with actor Nicholas Hope. They discuss the boundaries of what communities define as normal, the codes and standards that can go global, and the diverse viewpoints from which normality can be defined.

What does it mean “normality”?

In this interview, Paul speaks with Associate Professor Elizabeth Stephens from the University of Queensland who co-authored “Normality: A critical Genealogy” with Emeritus Professor Peter Cryle. Elizabeth talks about the history of the concept of normality and its ongoing persistence in contemporary popular culture.

Disrupting Normality – To save the planet.

In this episode, Paul speaks with Chief Conservation Officer at WWF Australia. Rachel talks about normalising good habits and patterns of behaviour in addressing environmental issues and habitat destruction as well as how we need to set new standards in policy and legislation. This enlightening conversation looks at ways to disrupt bad patterns as well as methods to instill patterns that are congruent with the health of the planet.

What do wild animals teach us about leadership?

In this episode, Paul speaks with Erna Walraven, Emeritus Curator and Senior Curator at Taronga Conservation Society Australia. Her book, “Wild Leadership: What wild animals teach us about leadership”, has been widely acclaimed as an insightful analysis into hierarchical social structures in other animals as well as a valuable tool for reflection about leadership among humans.
I hope you enjoy Erna’s perspectives as much as we did!

Does the concept of normality produce inequality?

In this episode, Paul speaks with Dr. Alice Krozer, a researcher based in Mexico working on inequalities. She is also the host of the Inequalities podcast on FutureFramed.TV.
They speak about normality, inequality, and how both of these concepts influence the other.
Have a watch!

Challenging the Conventional Western Diet

In this episode of Idioms of Normality, Paul meets Ruth Galloway who talks about crickets, gateway bugs, and edible insects. Ruth runs The Cricket Bakery and has been challenging the conventional Western diet for over six years by making and selling insect food for human consumption. What is a normal diet? And, what are the ethics of our eating habits?

What is normal? How does normality impact our lives? What would the world look like if we took seriously the idea that normality is not real? Accompany Paul on his exploratory tour to better understand the way in which people think about normality and the way it shapes our lives and impacts the planet.

In this episode, Paul speaks with Ash Morse a musician and psychotherapist based in Australia. They talk about Ash’s journey from a religious upbringing to becoming a stage musician and psychotherapist who questions normality in his everyday practice.

Can “ugliness” be pathologized?

In this episode, Paul speaks with the medical doctor and philosopher Dr Yves Saint James, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values at the University of Wollongong. Yves talks about definitions of normality in medicine and how ugliness is becoming pathologized in some branches of cosmetic and plastic surgery.

Seeing Normality as Commonality

In this episode, Paul speaks with Professor Greg Downey, an anthropologist at Macquarie University. They speak about normality in relation to elite performance, gender, blindness, neurodiversity, and the discrete privileged populations upon which the statistics of normality have been based.

Sexuality, Religion, and Culture.

In this episode, Paul speaks with Dr Siobhan Irving. She is an anthropologist based in Australia who has studied sexuality, religion, and culture in both Australia and Singapore. We speak about her personal reflections on normality as well as some of the theoretical dimensions as they play out in her work as an anthropologist.

Is normality stressful?

In this episode, Paul speaks with Dr Monty Badami, CEO of Habitus a social enterprise empowering people to work together more creatively and resiliently. He talks about normality in relation to human diversity and raises important questions about how normality is conceived and rolled out across diverse populations.

In the first episode, Paul speaks with Professor Anina Rich, a cognitive scientist at Macquarie University. We speak about synaesthesia, a condition where the senses become mixed in diverse combinations. For example, individuals might experience colour percepts in response to numbers, letters or words, or perhaps feel shapes in response to smells or tastes. A benign condition, synaesthesia is a fascinating case example to problematise and rethink what is normal.

Dr Paul Mason is an Australian anthropologist who works on human and planetary health. In this space, we share the conversations Paul has about normality with people from all walks of life from Australia and around the world.

What is normal? How does normality impact our lives? What would the world look like if we took seriously the idea that normality is not real? Accompany Paul on his exploratory tour to better understand the way in which people think about normality and the way it shapes our lives and impacts upon the planet.

responsibility-for-refugee-and-migrant-integration

Global Young Academy
We have been collaborating with the Global Young Academy on different video projects.
The Global Young Academy is an international society of young scientists, aiming to give a voice to young scientists across the globe. Membership strength is capped at 200, and the membership tenure is 5 years.

"The Global Young Academy gives a voice to young scientists around the world. To realise our vision, we develop, connect, and mobilise young talent from six continents. Moreover, we empower young researchers to lead international, interdisciplinary, and inter-generational dialogue with the goal to make global decision making evidence-based and inclusive."
https://globalyoungacademy.net/

Enjoy this mini-series produced together with the Women in Science working group:

We had the opportunity to interview the authors of the book: Responsibility for Refugee and Migrant Integration.

Find out more here:
globalyoungacademy.net/responsibility-for-refugee-and-migrant

dr-arya-shalini-subash

Dr. Shalini S. Arya is currently an Assistant Professor at the Food Engineering and Technology Department Institute of Chemical Technology in Mumbai. She works in the area of Indian traditional foods, in particular cereal-based staple foods such as chapatti, phulka, thepla, khakhara, thalipeeth, naan, and kulcha.

Her work is focused on various aspects such as product development and standardization, nutritional improvement and characterization, chemistry and technology, staling, extension of shelf life using various technologies (MAP, oxygen scavenger, chemical, freezing, etc) for these products, all of which would have far-reaching significance in improving public health in India and that too based on the resources that are locally available and food staples that are regularly consumed by the locals. She has more than 50 publications in international journals of high repute. Thus, Dr. Shalini is indirectly contributing to improving the public health of the Indian population.

In this video, she shares her personal story. The journey that started with the curiosity and the passion of a child.

You can find out more about her here: https://globalyoungacademy.net/sarya/

dr-flavia-ferreira-pires-my-story

Global Young Academy
We have been collaborating with the Global Young Academy on different video projects.
The Global Young Academy is an international society of young scientists, aiming to give a voice to young scientists across the globe. Membership strength is capped at 200, and the membership tenure is 5 years.

"The Global Young Academy gives a voice to young scientists around the world. To realise our vision, we develop, connect, and mobilise young talent from six continents. Moreover, we empower young researchers to lead international, interdisciplinary, and inter-generational dialogue with the goal to make global decision making evidence-based and inclusive."
https://globalyoungacademy.net/

Enjoy this mini-series produced together with the Women in Science working group:

Dr Flávia Ferreira Pires is Professor of Social Anthropology at the Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil.

She completed her bachelor degree in Social Sciences. She earned a Master´s and PhD degrees in Social Anthropology at the National Museum, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

She became a professor at a young age. Since then, she has been leading various research projects, mainly aiming at understanding the everyday lives of children from their own perspectives and the macro structures that outline their existence. She has published over forty papers, book chapters, and books in influential periodicals and journals in Brazil and elsewhere.

In this video, she shares her personal story.

You can find out more about her here: https://globalyoungacademy.net/fpires/

dr-anindita-bhadra-my-story

Global Young Academy
We have been collaborating with the Global Young Academy on different video projects.
The Global Young Academy is an international society of young scientists, aiming to give a voice to young scientists across the globe. Membership strength is capped at 200, and the membership tenure is 5 years.

"The Global Young Academy gives a voice to young scientists around the world. To realise our vision, we develop, connect, and mobilise young talent from six continents. Moreover, we empower young researchers to lead international, interdisciplinary, and inter-generational dialogue with the goal to make global decision making evidence-based and inclusive."
https://globalyoungacademy.net/

Enjoy this mini-series produced together with the Women in Science working group:

Dr. Anindita Bhadra is a behavioural biologist, working with free-ranging (stray) dogs in India. While pet dogs are studied extensively and compared with wolves in order to understand the evolution of the dog-human relationship, free-ranging dogs in India provide the perfect model system for studying them in nature, and building an understanding of the intrinsic nature of dogs. As they have hardly been studied so far, Dr. Bhadra chose the dogs as a model system, shifting completely from her zone of training and comfort, social insects. This gave her the freedom to set up a research group from scratch, doing things that she had never done before, and exploring new vistas of research.

Dr. Bhadra was involved in the founding of INYAS, and was elected as the first Chairperson by the founding members in June 2015.

In June 2020 she was elected co-chair of the Global Young Academy. In this video, she shares her personal story.

You can find out more about her here: https://globalyoungacademy.net/anindita-bhadra/

a-conversation-with-dr-narong-sirilertworakul-president-of-nstda

Conversations Across Borders
A podcast born as a collaboration between GlobalNet21 and Traces&Dreams

We met Dr. Narong Sirilertworakul a couple of weeks ago in Thailand. He is the President of Thailand’s National Science and Technology Development Agency, an organization focused on increasing Thailand’s reputation as a global competitor in the fields of scientific research and technology, with the aim of modernising the country’s industries, growing GDP, and improving quality of life for the people of Thailand.
Dr. Sirilertworakul holds a BA in Industrial Engineering and a PhD in Manufacturing Engineering. He has extensive experience in research, management, and quality, and was a founding member of the Thailand Quality Awards. Dr. Sirilertworakul also serves as a Chairman on the boards of several innovation and technology-based businesses.

introducing-the-world-sustainable-development-forum

World Sustainable Development Forum
A global forum for sustainable development
"WSDF would provide a vibrant platform for bringing all stakeholders together to move away from patterns of economic growth which ignore the damage and destruction to our planet as a consequence of current patterns of production and consumption."

https://worldsdf.org

Few would disagree that there’s growing evidence showing the terrible impact of climate change on our planet, but what exactly is being done about it? Although the Paris Climate Agreement is a step in the right direction, researchers and scientists believe that more focus needs to be given to the technological, economic, and policy dimensions of the challenge facing modern society today, as we are tasked with preserving the planet’s natural resources. Ahead of the World Sustainable Development Forum in Mexico City this week, its President, Dr Rajendra K. Pachauri, spoke to Traces.Dreams about the aims of the Forum, and the necessity in establishing long-term goals to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and protect the delicate ecosystems of our planet over the next century.

new-video-concerning-the-global-state-of-young-scientists-released

Global Young Academy
We have been collaborating with the Global Young Academy on different video projects.
The Global Young Academy is an international society of young scientists, aiming to give a voice to young scientists across the globe. Membership strength is capped at 200, and the membership tenure is 5 years.

"The Global Young Academy gives a voice to young scientists around the world. To realise our vision, we develop, connect, and mobilise young talent from six continents. Moreover, we empower young researchers to lead international, interdisciplinary, and inter-generational dialogue with the goal to make global decision making evidence-based and inclusive."
https://globalyoungacademy.net/

Enjoy this mini-series produced together with the Women in Science working group:

Watch our video about the amazing project The Global State of Young Scientists (GloSYS), a research project initiated by the Global Young Academy investigating the community of young scientists in and from Africa.

Traces&Dreams AB

c/o Impact Hub
Jakobsbergsgatan 22
111 44 Stockholm Sweden
Org. nr: 559336-2196

Join the community

Subscribe here to our newsletters and learn more about narratives, futures, and positive change.

Copyright © Traces&Dreams AB 2024

Privacy Policy